Christian Business Ordered to Duplicate Homosexual Activist Videos
Concerned Women for America - Christian Business Ordered to Duplicate Homosexual Activist Videos:
"In a case similar to a Canadian Christian printer’s punishment for declining a job for a homosexual activist group, an Arlington, Virginia, video duplicator has been ordered by the Arlington County Human Rights Commission to do a job for a lesbian activist.
The April 18 order follows a March 9 hearing in which Tim Bono of Bono Film and Video cited constitutional freedom of religion protection in refusing to duplicate two pro-homosexual films for lesbian activist Lillian Vincenz, according to the Family Policy Network (FPN), which is seeking clients for a class-action suit against the county.
Bono, a Christian, said he did not want to violate his Biblical values by assisting the promotion of homosexual behavior. Bono Film & Video informs potential customers that the firm does not duplicate material that the firm deems obscene, could embarrass employees, hurt the company’s reputation, or that runs counter to the company's Christian and ethical values, Bono told FPN.
After Bono rebuffed her request, Vincenz asked Arlington County officials to force Bono to duplicate her videos. The Arlington Human Rights Commission began an investigation and held a public hearing on March 9 to discuss the alleged discrimination.
As of April 25, neither Bono nor Vincenz had responded to the commission’s order, Raul Torres, executive director of the Human Rights Commission, told Concerned Women for America’s Culture & Family Institute (CFI).
If Bono refuses to do the job, “after a reasonable amount of time, the commission can reassemble and discuss why the remedy was not done,” Torres said. The commission could then forward the case to the full county Board of Commissioners and ask them for permission to file a discrimination complaint in Arlington Circuit Court, he said.
The decision found that:
* “Bono Film and Video is a public accommodation as defined by the Arlington County Code.”
* Bono “refused to duplicate two documentaries submitted by the Complainant, entitled: Gay and Proud and Second Largest Minority.”
* Bono “did not review the content of the documentaries.”
* Bono “perceived the Complainant to be ‘gay’ and to have a gay agenda when he communicated to her that Bono Film and Video ‘do[es] not partake in any gay agenda no matter what the content.’”
* “Chapter 31 [of Arlington County Code] prohibits discrimination by a public accommodation in the provisions of services on the basis of sexual orientation or perception thereof.”
The Arlington case is reminiscent of an Ontario human rights panel’s fining of a Christian printer, Scott Brockie, for his refusal to print materials for the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives."
This is one of the main reasons why homosexual couples want legal marriages. It will legitimize them in society and cause instances like these to be criminal.
They want to shift the discrimination from an ideology to a people group. We have a freedom to reject ideas but not reject people in most cases. They want their lifestyle choice (idea) to be seen as a natural trait to be protected like we protect the handicapped or women against discrimination.
I bet that same activist group would not allow a conservative Bible study or an author that opposed homosexuality to advertise on their website. It will be interesting how this ends up.










