Monday, January 31, 2005

Oh My, Sponge Bob

The media gets it wrong again. Maybe you saw in the paper that Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family sounded the alarm that Sponge Bob was pushing a homosexual agenda. This was not his point at all if they had checked their facts.

HobbsOnline has Dr. Dobson's entire letter posted. You will notice that his letter was intended to expose the use of popular cartoon characters by pro-homosexual groups to get alternative curriculum in front of school kids. His objection was aimed at the curriculum that asks such questions as:
"How are you affected by homophobia?"
"How would you be affected by your sexual orientation were it different than it is now?"
"How will understanding these definitions change your thinking about compulsory heterosexuality and homophobia?

The main stream media is alienating more and more of main stream America. Thirty-nine states have passed a defense of marriage act protecting marriage as being between a man and a woman. Every time it is put on a ballot the people overwhelmingly vote in favor of traditional marriage. There is nothing unloving or intolerant about keeping marriage consecrated.

Iraq Elections and our news outlets

Whether you agree with the war in Iraq or not it is essential that we form our opinions on facts. With that in mind, I grieve over the loss of integrity in our national press outlets. It seems they are bent on forming the news “Rather” than reporting the news.

The election in Iraq was a resounding success. The early estimate of 72% participation means that more than 10,000,000 Iraqis have cast ballots. That turnout is with the threat of violence and death and is almost 20% higher than the average presidential vote in America. You would never know it with the headlines and reports from our media.

The New York Times Sunday had this paragraph in their web site lead story on the vote in Iraq, “But if the insurgents wanted to stop people in Baghdad from voting, they failed. If they wanted to cause chaos, they failed. The voters were completely defiant, and there was a feeling that the people of Baghdad, showing a new, positive attitude, had turned a corner.”

Today the paragraph cannot even be found in the story. Apparently it was too positive sounding. The new edited story is now titled, “Attacks in Baghdad and Elsewhere Reportedly Kill Several Dozen”.

Check out these blogs for good resources on the election and news in Iraq. Instapundid.com or The Belmont Club

TIME: 25 Most Influential Evangelicals Photo Essay

Time Lists the 25 Most Influential Evangelicals Photo Essay. It is interesting to see which people they pick from their secular view point. It looks like they single out those who influence the kingdom of man more than the kingdom of God. However, I do agree with most of their choices.

Friday, January 28, 2005

Systematic Theology One project

Systematic Theology One project is almost complete. After teaching Bible Doctrines for the past seventeen years we have volume one edited and on CD. Calvary Chapel Rio Grande Valley in Belen, NM had such a demand for the class after I taught it that they put it on CD.



They took almost 26 hours of Systematic Theology one and edited them down to 19 hours on fifteen audio CDs. This first series covers the doctrines of the Bible, Angels and the Church. Here are some of the topics covered:

  • Are the Apocryphal books inspired?

  • How does the Book of Mormon compare to the Bible?

  • How unique is the Bible?

  • How accurate is the Bible? (Morally, Historically, Scientifically & Theologically)

  • Do you know the five proofs the Bible offers that it is inspired?

  • What types of ministries to angels have?

  • What abilities do demons have in this world?

  • Why should we practice baptism and communion?

  • We are also placing these same studies on two MP3 CDs with the syllabus, notes, and homework. You can actually hold a complete class from these two CDs.

    We hope to make them available by mid February.

    Thursday, January 27, 2005

    MovieGuide.org - Ted Baehr's Movieguide�

    MovieGuide.org - Ted Baehr's Movieguide�
    If you cringe when you go to the movies hoping that you will not be let down by a movie you thought was decent then this site is for you. Ted Baehr does an excellent job reviewing the movies and giving us a scale of acceptability.

    He has credibility with the Christian community and has been critiquing movies for many years.

    Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy

    Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy
    This problem is more widespread than previously reported. It is also far more advanced than I had known. See my previous post on this.

    This article states, "Weissman has already created mice with brains that are about one percent human.

    Later this year he may conduct another experiment where the mice have 100 percent human brains. This would be done, he said, by injecting human neurons into the brains of embryonic mice.

    Before being born, the mice would be killed and dissected to see if the architecture of a human brain had formed. If it did, he'd look for traces of human cognitive behavior.

    Weissman said he's not a mad scientist trying to create a human in an animal body. He hopes the experiment leads to a better understanding of how the brain works, which would be useful in treating diseases like Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease. "

    At least some in the scientific world are not comfortable with this experimentation. Cynthia Cohen is a member of Canada's Stem Cell Oversight Committee, which oversees research protocols to ensure they are in accordance with the new guidelines.

    She believes a ban should also be put into place in the U.S.

    Creating chimeras, she said, by mixing human and animal gametes (sperms and eggs) or transferring reproductive cells, diminishes human dignity.

    "It would deny that there is something distinctive and valuable about human beings that ought to be honored and protected," said Cohen, who is also the senior research fellow at Georgetown University's Kennedy Institute of Ethics in Washington, D.C.

    It seems like any experiment is legitimate as long as it will prolong lives or fight a disease. Could it be that there are large amounts of money to be made and it is easier to make it this way as opposed to other ways?

    Tuesday, January 25, 2005

    Russia's nationalists call for ban on Jewish groups

    Russia's nationalists call for ban on Jewish groups
    The article states, "Russia's nationalist lawmakers have asked the prosecutor general to ban all Jewish organizations because of their "extremist" views, in a vitriolic call ahead of this week's 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz."

    In Ezek. 38 and 39 God tells us that Gog and a host of nations will attack Israel in the last days. Many Biblical scholars have believed for some time now that Gog refers to Russia. It is very telling that Russia is experiencing an anti-Semitism that is mentioned in the same breath as Nazism. Russia is befriending many Islamic nations for some unexplained reason.

    Watch this movement carefully because it is one of the most significant last day’s prophecies given to us. God’s word is perfect and trustworthy in every aspect.

    Monday, January 24, 2005

    markdroberts.com

    markdroberts.com
    This site is one of the best in terms of Christian Blogging. Mark is an excellent communicator and researcher. Check out his blog on the The birth of Jesus.

    Mark Roberts reviews and answers the skeptics at Time and Newsweek on the Virgin birth of Christ. I think you will enjoy his thorough apologetics on the subject.

    Thursday, January 20, 2005

    Euthanasia debate in Europe focuses on children

    Euthanasia debate in Europe focuses on children
    This is not just a debate but a practice. Dutch Doctors have killed at least four babies in late 2004 when they determined that they would not live long or have a high quality of life. It's another slip on an already slippery slope.

    The article says that the decision is up to the experts and not the parents. I am not saying that parents should be encouraged to kill their children. The point is that doctors can kill a child without the parent’s consent. This is scary. It’s bad enough that they are killing the elderly with consent now they are killing the young without consent.

    The quality of life argument is always used to tug on peoples hearts. No one wants children to suffer any discomfort. However that is not a valid argument to kill people. Think about it. Is it discomforting to be put to death against your will? Their solution for a lower quality of life is to eliminate any life that exists.

    Is it wrong to suffer a lower quality of life? Not all suffering is wrong or useless. Suffering can teach us many things including the appreciation when we do gain a higher quality of life. Quality of life is a subjective term. By whose standard to we kill people?

    This is the outcome from a world view based on evolution. There is no value in the sanctity of life. This is the same mindset that allowed Hitler to kill millions. He preached that the weak were inferior so they started to kill the handicapped first before they started to kill the Jews. Europe is headed in a very dangerous direction.

    Wednesday, January 19, 2005

    CitizenLink - Morning after pill to be offered over-the-counter?

    CitizenLink - Legislative Action
    This pill is also known as RU-486 or the abortion pill. It causes a miscarriage of the baby and has many dangerous side effects. The FDA is expected to decide soon whether to offer the drug for over-the-counter sales.

    This means that girls as young as sixteen years old could purchase the drug without parental permission. Use this site to send an email of objection to the FDA Commissioner.

    Tuesday, January 18, 2005

    Our Daily Bread: A Daily Devotional and more

    Our Daily Bread: A Daily Devotional is a great devotional site. You can click on a link and email it to a friend or download it to your pocket PC. You can actually get it in six different languages. You can also search devotions by topic. Speaking of searching, check out the Bible Gateway link and search the Bible online.

    Take time when you break for a meal or when you are just browsing the web to read a short devotion.

    Saturday, January 15, 2005

    Parent sues district on Darwin-only rule

    WorldNetDaily: Parent sues district on Darwin-only rule is another example that displays the outright bigotry of some school districts in America. They not only want just one side told to the students but they do not want any scientific evidence that critiques their theory. That narrow view is not scientific, open or tolerant in any stretch of the imagination. I write this because these are the labels they usually stick on those of us who believe in creationism.

    BTW, here is more evidence that throws off the timeline and theory of evolution. A Fossil found in China shows a baby dinosaur in a mammal's belly. Evolutionists did not believe that large mammals existed during the time of the dinosaurs. Evolutionists teach that mankind and dinosaurs DID NOT live at the same time.

    However, burial stones discovered in Peru were recently reported on Fox News Network's "Fox Report" with Shepherd Smith show they did. Government archaeologists have found thousands of these stones which seem to depict dinosaurs. These prehistoric stones indicate that ancient man had direct contact with dinosaurs. There is strong evidence that men and dinosaurs existed at the same time. The photo below shows a man riding a Triceratops and smoking a peace pipe!



    Also, Answers in Genesis is a great website dedicated to giving reasons for creationism.

    Friday, January 14, 2005

    Cross Points from Sunday Dec. 19, 2004

    The Woman caught in Adultery 8:1-11

    Laying a Trap for Jesus

    (John 8:1 NKJV) But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives.

    (John 8:2 NKJV) Now early in the morning He came again into the temple, and all the people came to Him; and He sat down and taught them.

    (John 8:3 NKJV) Then the scribes and Pharisees brought to Him a woman caught in adultery. And when they had set her in the midst,

    (John 8:4 NKJV) they said to Him, “Teacher, this woman was caught in adultery, in the very act.

    (John 8:5 NKJV) “Now Moses, in the law, commanded us that such should be stoned. But what do You say?”

    (John 8:6 NKJV) This they said, testing Him, that they might have something of which to accuse Him. But Jesus stooped down and wrote on the ground with His finger, as though He did not hear.

    It did not appear Jesus was given hospitality

    8:1 The people went to their own houses (7:53). Jesus, who had no place to lay His head (see Luke 9:58), spent the night on the Mount of Olives.

    The people stayed because Jesus was considered a Prophet

    8:2 Early in the morning literally means “at dawn.” all the people came: Because the Feast of Tabernacles had concluded the day before (7:2, 37), many visitors were still in Jerusalem. Attracted by the appearance of a noted rabbi, a crowd rapidly gathered. He sat: Teachers in ancient Israel sat when they taught. Jesus assumed the position of an authoritative teacher.


    The Pharisees considered Jesus a threat

    8:3 Abruptly bringing the adulterous woman into the midst of the proceedings was a rude disruption. The Pharisees were bent on confounding Jesus (7:45).


    Certain cases of adultery were punished by stoning

    8:4, 5 such should be stoned: Stoning was specified in certain cases of adultery (see Deut. 22:23, 24), though not all.

    (Deu 22:23 NKJV) “If a young woman who is a virgin is betrothed to a husband, and a man finds her in the city and lies with her,

    (Deu 22:24 NKJV) “then you shall bring them both out to the gate of that city, and you shall stone them to death with stones, the young woman because she did not cry out in the city, and the man because he humbled his neighbor’s wife; so you shall put away the evil from among you.


    The motive of the authorities is clear when they intended to punish the woman but not the man.

    If she were caught in the very act of adultery then why wasn’t the man brought as well? This shows the motive of the accusers. They may have set up the woman as well as Jesus.

    The trap for Jesus is set

    God through Moses says but what do you say Jesus?

    In the Greek text, the pronoun You is emphatic. The religious leaders were trying to trap Jesus into saying something that was contrary to the Law.

    8:6 testing Him: If Jesus had said not to stone her, He would have contradicted Jewish law. If He had said to stone her, He would have run counter to Roman law, which did not permit Jews to carry out their own executions (18:31). They probably thought they had finally baffled Jesus.

    Caught in their own trap

    (John 8:7 NKJV) So when they continued asking Him, He raised Himself up and said to them, “He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.”

    (John 8:8 NKJV) And again He stooped down and wrote on the ground.

    (John 8:9 NKJV) Then those who heard it, being convicted by their conscience, went out one by one, beginning with the oldest even to the last. And Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

    (John 8:10 NKJV) When Jesus had raised Himself up and saw no one but the woman, He said to her, “Woman, where are those accusers of yours? Has no one condemned you?”

    (John 8:11 NKJV) She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said to her, “Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.”

    The witnesses were to cast the first stone

    The witnesses were normally the first to throw the stones, but false witnesses were to pay the same penalty they had hoped to inflict on their victim (Deut 17:7; 19:19).

    (Deu 17:7 NKJV) “The hands of the witnesses shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterward the hands of all the people. So you shall put away the evil from among you.




    God wrote the Ten Commandments with His finger

    8:6–8. God wrote the Ten Commandments with his finger (Ex 31:18; Deut 9:10); perhaps Jesus writes the first line of the tenth commandment in the Septuagint of Exodus 20: “You shall not covet your neighbor’s wife.” This text would declare them all guilty of adultery (Mt 5:28).

    This proposal is at best speculation, but we have here the continuing irony of John. Here is the picture. These men are attempting to stone this woman based on the law of God that was written by the finger of God. Jesus who is God manifested in the flesh is writing on the temple stone with His finger convicting these men one by one. They did not realize that they were demanding Jesus take a stand on the very law He wrote with His finger in stone 1,400 years earlier.

    The trappers have become the trapped

    This turned the trap on the scribes and Pharisees because if they have not cast the first stones they would be violating God’s law. If they had they would be violating Roman law.


    Jesus did not violate the God’s law because there were not two witnesses to accuse her.

    There must be two witnesses for a capital punishment

    (Deu 19:15 NKJV) “One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established.

    (Deu 19:16 NKJV) “If a false witness rises against any man to testify against him of wrongdoing,

    (Deu 19:17 NKJV) “then both men in the controversy shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges who serve in those days.

    (Deu 19:18 NKJV) “And the judges shall make careful inquiry, and indeed, if the witness is a false witness, who has testified falsely against his brother,

    (Deu 19:19 NKJV) “then you shall do to him as he thought to have done to his brother; so you shall put away the evil from among you.


    Jesus forgave her sin without condoning the sin

    8:11 Sin no more implies that Jesus forgave her. He did not condemn her, but neither did He condone her sin.

    This is a great example of how the Father responds to us when we are caught in our sin.


    HughHewitt.com

    HughHewitt.com is the website of one of my favorite radio personalities. Hugh is a political and cultural commentator with an intellectual Christian worldview. His blog will keep you in the loop and greatly broaden your mind.

    Thursday, January 13, 2005

    The new 'Ten Commandments'

    It looks like the Entertainment community wants to cash in on the success of Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ". ABC is set to produce a new four-hour $20 million dollar miniseries about Moses and the Ten Commandments. This article also states, "Another "Ten Commandments" miniseries is in the works at the FX cable channel, but the 10-hour project, executive produced by Steven Soderbergh and George Clooney, is a contemporary take on the ancient rules and is set in modern America." It is really difficult to get excited about these Hollywood versions of the Bible.

    Scientists debate blending of human, animal forms

    Pigs with human blood is only one example of the real experiments happening today. Scientists are not just pushing the envelope they are crossing the line. These types of cross engineering will bring some advancement to the medical world but they will also cause harm. Ultimately, we could end up with hybrid humans that are not truly human at all. One wonders if such a person with spliced DNA is redeemable.


    Mouse with Human Ear Growing on it's Back

    What is a blog?

    blog
    A frequent, chronological publication of personal thoughts and Web links.

    Information

    A blog is often a mixture of what is happening in a person's life and what is happening on the Web, a kind of hybrid diary/guide site, although there are as many unique types of blogs as there are people.